We found an article recently about building a new copy of a Stradivarius violin using a CAT scanner and replicating the densities on 3D CAD software and then replicating the build into a brand new violin.
While this is an amazing use of technology and impressive in concept, it threw up a few questions to us in the wider area of musical instrument manufacturing. While throughout the years we have certainly seen high points (and low points) in terms of classic design and workmanship, this direction gives the impression that the best instruments have already been made.
We can’t get over the fact that this outlook is pessimistic at best and anti-innovative at worst. Why do we have to keep going back and trying to replicate the past when it comes to instruments? Why not itterate and innovate so that people in 100 years will be looking back at us and saying, “Wow, they made amazing progress in the early 2000s when it came to amazing instruments.”
Some companies are better at this than others. Yamaha guitars for example constantly itterate and improve their designs. Listening to people who give them feedback and keeping an eye on returns and where the weak points in their products are and fixing them in the next version. They should be applauded for this, Yamaha are one of the few companies that do improve dramatically model on model. Tanglewood Guitars are another company that we have found listen to us and while the process of improving a musical instrument product is not a quick one it is going in the correct direction.
While it is a slow process in physical goods, if you look towards the software technology sector where software is updated sometimes daily, you can see how companies compete at such a rate that consumers are getting an often amazing and constantly improving product.









Facebook
Twitter
Google Plus